Council Meeting Minutes #4: January
22-23, 2004
Orbis Cascade Alliance Council Meeting
January 22-23, 2004
Washington State University - Vancouver
Vancouver, Washington
Present:
David Bilyeu (COCC), Tom Peischl (CWU), Patty Cutright(EOU), Pat Kelley (EWU),
Lee Lyttle (TESC), Merrill Johnson (GFU), Jim Kopp (L&C), Susan Barnes
Whyte (Linfield), Nancy Hoover (Marylhurst), Jim Morgan (OHSU), Marita Kunkel
(OIT), Karyle Butcher (OSU), Ben Wakashige (Pacific), Berniece Owen (PCC), Tom
Pfingsten (PSU), Vickie Hanawalt (Reed), Scot Harrison (Thurs.) & Dalia
Hagan (Friday) (SMC), Ray Doerksen (SPU), Sue Burkholder (SOU), Deb Carver
(UO), Rich Hines (UP), Karen Fischer (UPS), Betsy Wilson (UW), Leslie Wykoff
for Ginny Steel (WSU), Gary Jensen (WOU), Béla Foltin (WWU), Henry Yaple
(Whitman), Joni Roberts (Willamette)
Absent:
none
Consortium
staff: Greg Doyle, John F. Helmer, Travis Honea, Nancy Nathanson.
Guests
on Friday: Tom Stave (UO), Lori Robare (UO)
Welcome
from Leslie Wykoff, Director of Information Services, WSU-Vancouver.
Meeting
was chaired by Carver.
1. Introductions
2. Review of agenda (Carver)
3. Approval of minutes from October 9-10, 2003.
** DECISION: Approved
with no revisions.
4. Reports
4.1. Executive Committee (Carver)
EC's January 6 business
meeting and membership visit to Seattle University were rescheduled for January
15th due to weather.
EC proposes an annual
meeting schedule based on three Council meetings in the Portland/Vancouver
area, and one outside this area.
Campuses with new library buildings or renovations should be given
preference as meeting locations.
Retreats should be held as needed and probably occur outside of the
Portland/Vancouver area. EC proposes to
hold a business meeting (i.e., not a retreat) on April 8-9 in Eugene. Whitman would be a good choice for the next
retreat.
Carver reviewed the
document "Summary of appointments to Task Forces and changes to Steering
Team appointments" included in Council's packet.
** DECISIONS:
-
April Council meeting
location: University of Oregon
-
July Council meeting:
Portland Community College
-
Council asked Executive
Committee to appoint chairs for the Summit Catalog and Collection Management
Task Forces.
Butcher suggested that
EC or a new task force investigate creation of an option for affiliate
membership.
4.2. Executive Director (Helmer)
Helmer reviewed his
written report. Additions to the
written report include:
-
Courier service: Helmer,
Nathanson, and Honea had a productive meeting with Steve Schmidt, CEO of Edge
Logistics, the parent company of Consolidated Routing. Consortium staff
reviewed service concerns, changes at Consolidated Routing, and ways to improve
to courier service.
-
Helmer provided copies
of his recent article concerning statewide database purchasing in Oregon. This article will be included in a special
issue of OLA Quarterly devoted to an assessment of progress toward OLA's "Vision
2010."
-
Helmer reviewed a
proposal to work with OCLC Western on a conference called the Western Forum on
Newspaper Digitization. Helmer
indicated that hosting duties will probably be modeled after the annual
OCLC/Alliance Northwest ILL and Resource Sharing conference.
-
WSU has made progress on
plans to build a storage facility and Helmer suggested that an update on RLSC
be held to Friday when Steel is expected to join the group. Council agreed.
4.3. ICCL (Kelley)
ICCL is discussing their
financial request for next year, CLP committee structure, and filtering
legislation.
4.4. OUS Library Council (Jensen)
Jensen reviewed changes
in the State Board of Higher Education, impact of Measure 30 (defeating a
temporary tax increase), and collaborative possibilities within OUS.
4.5. PORTALS (Johnson)
PORTALS Council met in
October to discuss a consultant's report on options for the future of the
organization. Council decided to
continue PORTALS as an organization and to fill a staff position. Dues structure is under consideration. Jan Fortier is continuing as chair through
July.
4.6. GWLA (Butcher, Carver, Steel, Wilson)
GWLA has been awarded an
IMLS grant for "Waters in the West," a digitizing project focusing on
four western rivers. They are considering ways for non-members to contribute to
the project. Topics of interest include
bioengineering portals, institutional repositories, and OCLC pricing on CJK
cataloging. GWLA's next meeting will
focus on capital campaigns.
4.7. OCLC (Carver, Hanawalt, Wilson)
The new chair of OCLC is
Betsy Wilson. Liz Bishoff is joining
OCLC to develop their digitization program.
OCLC's recently published "Environmental Scan" is quite good,
recommended reading for Council members.
5. Summit (Nathanson)
Nathanson reviewed her
report on progress and issues related to the creation of Summit.
5.1. Union Catalog
Nathanson's report
included two recommendations:
1. Assign a catalog task force to review policy and procedures for
cataloging electronic resources (multiple vs. single records; links)
2. Consider the duplicate record issues, with respect to both policy
and cost, and whether to adopt expectations or guidelines for new and current
members. For example: Initial loading of new member records: expectations for
record enhancements, etc.? Cost to consortium for dealing with duplicate
records (patrons; staff) vs. cost to individual member to "clean up"
duplicate records.
** DECISION: Summit
Catalog Task Force charge will be revised to include a review of policy and
procedure for cataloging electronic resources.
** ACTION: Helmer will
draft changes to the Summit Catalog Task Force charge for approval by Executive
Committee.
** DECISION: Applicants for membership will be asked to
report on extent of duplicate bibliographic records that would be created if
their catalog records are added to Summit.
New members will be asked to update records to add OCLC numbers or take
other actions aimed at avoiding duplication prior to loading. Current members are urged to investigate
duplicates and schedule appropriate database work.
** ACTION: Consortium
staff will draft changes to the membership application process and Contribution
and Display Policy
(http://www.orbiscascade.org/staffhome/contribution_and_display_policy.html) to
address Council's interest in avoiding duplicate records.
5.2. Summit Borrowing Additional topics explored included
-
concern that increased
Summit Borrowing volume may yield a rise in courier fees.
-
interest in revising the
page 3 pie chart to indicate size of population (undergraduate, graduate,
staff) relative to number of requests.
5.3. Fines and return of materials
Council reviewed
Nathanson's discussion of the impact of fines on the timely return of
materials. This topic and an analysis
conducted by Butcher, Nathanson, and Mark Kibbey (UW) grew out of Council's
decision of differing Orbis and Cascade policies concerning fines.
** DECISION: Council
concluded that no problem is evident at this time and the present policy should
stand. (http://www.orbiscascade.org/staffhome/OB,ILL,onsite_borrow-policy.htm)
6. Interest Groups (Helmer)
** DECISION: Music and Science Interest Group proposals were
approved.
** ACTION: Consortium
staff will work with facilitators, set up email lists, etc. to get these groups
started.
7. Data for Local Communities (Stave & Robare)
Stave and Robare
provided a demonstration of the DLC Web site (http://libweb.uoregon.edu/dlc)
and participated in a discussion of future directions for this resource.
Council congratulated
Stave, Robare, and the former Orbis government documents committee on their
achievement and suggested that Stave consider forming an interest group to help
support the project.
8. Governance (Carver)
8.1. Bylaws
Council discussed
revisions to Bylaws recommended by Executive Committee.
** DECISIONS. Expand
Executive Committee to seven members (chair, past chair, chair-elect, and four
members at large) and define a quorum as two-thirds rather than a majority
present.
In addition to Executive
Committee's recommendations, Council identified the following Bylaws
amendments:
Article III, number 4
Existing text: "In the event that a member of the Executive Committee is unable
to serve, Council may elect any eligible Council member to fill the seat."
Amendment: "In the event of a vacancy on the Executive Committee, Council
may elect any eligible Council member to fill the seat."
Article V, number 1
Delete: "In the event of a vacancy, the Committee shall select a
replacement immediately, with approval by Council."
** ACTION: In accordance
with Article IX, Helmer will distribute Bylaws with proposed amendments to all
Council members at least 14 days prior the April Council vote.
8.2. Election of Executive Committee
** DECISION: Council
approved revised procedures for Executive Committee elections with the
clarification that "majority" is defined as the majority of those
votes cast, not necessarily a majority of all Council members. Council recognizes the election of
additional members-at-large will not be valid unless bylaws are revised as
previously discussed.
** ACTION: Helmer will
proceed under the revised February through March voting process in expectation
of Council's approval of revised bylaws in April.
[The election process is
available at
http://libweb.uoregon.edu/orbis/staffhome/Council-EC_election.html]
8.3. Transitional Executive Committee for FY03/04
Council discussed Executive
Committee's proposed process for selecting a Transitional Executive Committee
for FY04/05. Council members generally
agreed with the process outlined but some advised that the bylaws define
eligibility.
** MOTION: Yaple moved to accept Executive Committee's
proposed process as written. Seconded
by Butcher. After discussion, Jensen called for the question. The motion passed with 23 YES votes, 4 NO
votes, and one abstention.
9. Membership applications (Carver)
9.1. Clark College
** DECISION: Council
voted to approve Clark College's application for membership.
9.2. Seattle University:
discussion and vote
** DECISION: Council
voted to approve Seattle University's application for membership.
** ACTION Helmer will
draft letters offering membership to Clark College and Seattle University.
9.3. Mount Hood Community College: review and discuss
** DECISION: Council
briefly reviewed this newly received membership application and asked Executive
Committee to schedule a site visit, per standard application procedures.
10. Discussion topics
10.1.
Community
colleges: membership models and priorities.
Should the Alliance explore additional financial, governance, or
technical models for community college involvement? (Bilyeu)
Council discussed
Cascade and Orbis history with regard to membership criteria and costs. Issues explored included:
-
Benefits of
collaboration among diverse academic institutions
-
Availability of
resources needed to add more members
-
High cost of adding
institutions one at a time; should we be encouraging shared INNOPAC systems
among groups of new participants? See MOBIUS (Missouri) model
-
Challenges growth will
pose for governance; how big can Council get and still be effective?
-
Alliance model may not
be affordable for some smaller institutions
-
Experiences (pro and
con) of establishing an associate member category at other consortia
-
Potential for group
memberships as proposed by OPALL
-
Importance of
accreditation
-
Should we be looking at
models for non-academic libraries?
-
Should we confine an investigation
to community colleges or should private colleges be considered as well?
-
Is a moratorium on
membership applications needed while Council completes its analysis?
-
Is there a finite aspect
to the Alliance?
-
Should we evolve a
membership model that is user centered as opposed to focusing on type of
institution?
** DECISION Council
decided that the Alliance should discuss obstacles to membership and
investigate other models for collaboration.
Past experience has shown that an overly broad investigation of
membership issues can be unwieldy and unproductive. As a result, Council decided to confine investigation to
institutions that are already qualified for membership under current Alliance
criteria. i.e., two and four-year
accredited non-profit academic institutions in Oregon and Washington.
** MOTION. A motion was made to place a moratorium on
membership applications for six months (note taker missed who made and seconded
the motion). Motion failed to pass: 2
YES votes, 25 NO votes.
** DECISION: Council
decided to form a broadly representative Council task force to investigate
membership. Early activities should
include discussions with the Independent Colleges of Washington (ICW), Oregon
Private Academic Library Link (OPALL), Library and Media Directors' Council
(LMDC) of Washington State, and the Oregon Community College Library
Association (OCCLA).
** ACTION: Executive
Committee will draft a charge and membership for Council approval via email.
10.2.
When should the
Alliance accept partnership offers or seek partnerships with other
organizations? How do we determine priorities for collaboration and degree of
resource commitment?
Council ran out of time
but may elect to discuss this issue in the future.
11. Announcements
RLSC
Steel was unable to join
Council on Friday due to inclement weather. As a result, Council's discussion
was brief and based on partial information Helmer provided.
Helmer understands that
WSU is likely to have funding available to begin construction in summer 2005
with building occupancy in spring 2006. Construction is contingent on the
Washington Legislature appropriating funds.
Council discussed the
merits of broadening our RLSC investigation to include these developments at
WSU and concluded that Helmer and Hanawalt should investigate further with
Steel. Such an investigation does not
impact our continued work with OHSU and Linfield College.
Council ran out of time
for other announcements.
Minutes
-- Honea & Helmer